Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Cazaux vs Daniel De Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cazaux vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Cazaux vs Daniel De Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cazaux 1 - 0 Jonge
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cazaux has won 51.89% of points on their second serve, while Jonge has won 41.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cazaux, in recent form, has won 48.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 54.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.47% and 30.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cazaux has saved 61.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 57.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cazaux has won 55.36% of matches played (W/L 31/ 25), with Jonge winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cazaux has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 87/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15). Jonge has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 29/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Cazaux has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10), where as Jonge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.77% of matches (W/L 29/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cazaux winning 1 times and Jonge being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cazaux winning 2 and Jonge winning 0. The last match between Cazaux and Jonge was at the M15 Sarreguemines, 28-10-2020, First, Carpet with Arthur Cazaux getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cazaux and Jonge have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cazaux winning 0 times and Jonge 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cazaux winning 0, and Jonge 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cazaux has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.86 while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of 121.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cazaux has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cazaux has converted 36.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 45.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
98
Rank
74
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
63% (152-89)
Career Total W/L
56% (96-74)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$466,125
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Arthur Cazaux vs Daniel De Jonge For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Cazaux VS Jonge
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Arthur Cazaux | Daniel De Jonge |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (36/56) | 49% (33/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (31/36) | 61% (20/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (8/20) | 47% (16/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (31/67) | 30% (17/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Daniel De Jonge
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Cazaux | Daniel De Jonge |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (36/26) | 48% (21/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (324/285) | 49% (190/201) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 226 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.54 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 103 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:46 | 1:21:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 241.88 | 33.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1106/1873) | 51% (515/1019) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (843/1106) | 68% (348/515) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (398/767) | 41% (209/504) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (64/173) | 45% (42/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (688/1886) | 40% (402/997) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 86% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 50% (10/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 10% (10/1) |
Arthur Cazaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Arthur Cazaux
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
7
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
9
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
40 of
48)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
24 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Arthur Cazaux
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Cazaux
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
79 of
128)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
128)
131
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
36
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Arthur Cazaux
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Arthur Cazaux
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel De Jonge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Daniel De Jonge
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Luke Simkiss
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Staeheli
Player
Daniel De Jonge
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
59%
(
16 of
27)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Daniel De Jonge
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Filip Pieczonka
46%
(
31 of
67)
1st Serve %
42%
(
21 of
50)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Jakub Jedrzejczak
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
1
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kaukovalta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
37%
(
24 of
65)
1st Serve %
31%
(
16 of
52)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Unknown Player
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
45
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Cazaux Vs Jonge Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Cazaux are available here and Jonge photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
